CSS vs JavaScript Animations

CSS vs JavaScript Animations

·

3 min read

Table of contents

No heading

No headings in the article.

CSS or Cascading Style Sheet as the name suggests is used to add style to a web page. Amongst other things, it can also be used to create animations as well as transitions effortlessly. On the other hand, JavaScript is used to make a web page or website interactive. JavaScript can also be used to create animations, however, you might be wondering which one is better. CSS or JavaScript? To know that, first we need to take a look at creating animations with CSS and JavaScript.

CSS Animations:

In CSS, the @keyframes command is used to create animations. Note that @keyframes might not work on every browser. The table below specifies which version of different browsers can support @keyframes :

For example, consider the following code snippet:

@keyframes works by slowly transitioning from the beginning position or beginning styles to the modified positions or styles. To declare a keyframes animation, @keyframes is used along with the name of your animation. Inside the brackets, you'll have to declare the "from" which is the starting position and the "to" which is the final position. "From" and "to" are the equivalent of "0%" and "100%" which is also an alternative you can use.

If you want to create an animation that is a bit more complex, i.e. has a couple of different stages, you can use different percentages such as "20%", "50%" etc. which can apply different styles or different properties at different stages in your animation. Consider the code below which uses different stages to change the colour of a div:

Notice the syntax used to give the animation properties to the div. animation-name, and animation-duration. The following table contains a few of the essential CSS animation properties.

You can condense all of these properties into a single line using the animation: property with the following syntax :
animation: name duration timing-function delay iteration-count direction fill-mode play-state;

JavaScript :

JavaScript animations are a tad bit trickier. Consider the following piece of code, which we'll break down to understand how to build a JavaScript animation.

In our HTML section, we've created a button and passed the method "move()" to it to be called on a user's click. In function move(), we've assigned the element "animate" which is a div to the constant "elem". Setting the initial position variable (pos) to 50, we then create a new frame every 5 milliseconds (using setInterval(frame, 5)). This will go on for as long as the position does not become 350. While the position is not 350, we increment the value of pos by 1. The only thing left to do is to assign the new positions to the element.

Conclusion:

While I agree that both CSS and Js are great in their own ways, there needs to be a clear winner. That winner, for me, would be CSS. CSS, although used mostly for simpler "one-shot" animations is much more efficient than JavaScript which, however, is still preferred for advanced and more complex animations. CSS can be used to create a wide variety of animations smoothly and seamlessly without any of the complex syntaxes that come with JavaScript (who wants to write that much code?!).